Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.
Give answer:
- (A) If only argument I is strong
- (B) If only argument II is strong
- (C) If either I or II is strong
- (D) If neither I nor II is strong and
- (E) If both I and II are strong.
36. |
Statement: Should taxes on colour television be further increased?
Arguments:
- Yes, Colour television is a luxury item and only rich people buy them.
- No, Televisions are bought by the poor too.
|
A. |
Only argument I is strong |
B. |
Only argument II is strong |
C. |
Either I or II is strong |
D. |
Neither I nor II is strong |
E. |
Both I and II are strong |
Answer: Option D
Explanation:
Clearly, taxes on an item cannot be increased or decreased on the basis of the financial position of the people who buy it. So, both arguments I and II do not hold strong.
|
37. |
Statement: Should the educated unemployed youth be paid “unemployment allowance” by the Government?
Arguments:
- Yes. It will provide them some monetary help to either seek employment or to kick-start some ‘self-employment’ venture.
- No. It will dampen their urge to do something to earn their livelihood and thus promote idleness among the unemployed youth.
|
A. |
Only argument I is strong |
B. |
Only argument II is strong |
C. |
Either I or II is strong |
D. |
Neither I nor II is strong |
E. |
Both I and II are strong |
Answer: Option E
Explanation:
Young people, who do not get employment due to the large number of applicants in all fields, must surely be given allowance so that they can support themselves. So, argument I is valid. However, such allowances would mar the spirit to work, in them and make them idle. So, argument II also holds.
|
38. |
Statement: Should higher education be restricted to only those who can bear the expenditure?
Arguments:
- Yes. Higher education is very costly; hence it should not be given free.
- No. There are a large number of brilliant students who cannot afford to pay and they should be given higher education.
|
A. |
Only argument I is strong |
B. |
Only argument II is strong |
C. |
Either I or II is strong |
D. |
Neither I nor II is strong |
E. |
Both I and II are strong |
|
39. |
Statement: Should those who receive dowry, despite the law prohibiting it, be punished?
Arguments:
- Yes. Those who violate the law must be punished.
- No. Dowry system is firmly rooted in the society since time immemorial.
|
A. |
Only argument I is strong |
B. |
Only argument II is strong |
C. |
Either I or II is strong |
D. |
Neither I nor II is strong |
E. |
Both I and II are strong |
Answer: Option A
Explanation:
Clearly, laws are made to ensure that no person pursues the practice. So, persons who violate the laws need to be punished. Thus, argument I holds. A wrong practice, no matter how firmly rooted, needs to be ended. So, argument II is vague.
|
40. |
Statement: Is the Government justified in spending so much on defence?
Arguments:
- Yes. Safety of the country is of prime importance.
- No. During peace, this money could be used for the development of the country.
|
A. |
Only argument I is strong |
B. |
Only argument II is strong |
C. |
Either I or II is strong |
D. |
Neither I nor II is strong |
E. |
Both I and II are strong |
Answer: Option A
Explanation:
Clearly, defence is necessary for the safety of the country, which is of prime importance. So, argument I holds. Also, a country can concentrate on internal progress and development only when it is safe from external aggressions. So, argument II does not hold.
|
Related